Can You Use Sunscreen and Insect Repellent Together?

Back to blog

Not by layering two separate products since each order compromises one of them. Repellent applied over sunscreen can disrupt the film the SPF depends on. Repellent applied underneath gets sealed beneath that film and can't evaporate, which is how repellents work. A combined formula exists so both jobs happen from one layer, tested together.

Should repellent go on before or after sunscreen?

With two separate bottles, Cancer Council advises sunscreen first, left to absorb, then the repellent over the top. Their reasoning for that order explains the second half of the problem: a repellent has to evaporate off the skin to produce the aura that turns insects away, and sunscreen applied on top can block it.

That is why repellent-first is not the answer either. The repellent is doing its work in the air above the skin, and a layer of sunscreen over it gets in the way.

The other direction has its own cost. Sunscreen protects as a thin, even film, and DEET is a solvent strong enough that repellent labels warn it can damage synthetic fabrics and plastics. The US CDC's guidance for travellers notes that DEET-based repellents applied over sunscreen reduce the SPF by about a third, and suggests reapplying sunscreen more often to account for it. So with two bottles, whichever goes on first, something is working at less than the number on its label.

Why a combined formula avoids both problems

In a combination product, the sunscreen actives and the repellent go into one formula before any of it reaches skin, so there is one layer doing both jobs and nothing sitting on top of anything else. The repellent evaporates from the surface of that layer the way it was designed to.

The SPF is treated the same way: under the Australian standard, AS/NZS 2604, SPF is measured on human skin wearing the finished formula, repellent included, so whatever the interaction costs is already inside the number on the label. Layering cannot offer that. When a standalone spray lands on a sunscreen, neither label accounts for what the other one does.

What did the Australian research find?

The peer-reviewed study is Webb and Russell, published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health in 2009. They tested repellents on human skin against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and measured mean protection time. A 7.14% DEET formulation combined with sunscreen held for 240 minutes against 230 minutes for a 6.98% DEET repellent alone found no significant difference.

The finding held across concentrations, from about 7% DEET up to 80%: combining repellent and sunscreen in a single formulation does not reduce the repellent's protection time. The same trials tested sunscreen reapplied over the top of repellent every two hours, which is the routine the two-bottle approach produces, and there the protection times fell significantly. Webb has attributed that to physical disruption of the repellent layer by the sunscreen going on over it.

How are combination products regulated in Australia?

A combined product sold in Australia answers to two regulators, and both assess the product you buy:

  • The sunscreen side is a listed therapeutic good with the TGA, which is the AUST L number on the pack (AUST L 310426), and listing requires compliance with the Australian sunscreen standard, AS/NZS 2604, including SPF testing on human skin using the finished formula.
  • The repellent side is registered with the APVMA (APVMA 86717), which assesses repellents for safety and efficacy when used as directed.

Why do some experts advise separate products?

Most of the advice against combination products comes from the United States and Canada, and it is reasonable for the products and rules it describes. The US Food and Drug Administration proposed in 2019 that sunscreen-insect repellent combinations be classed as not generally recognised as safe and effective. The stated ground is labelling rather than chemistry: in the US the sunscreen half answers to the FDA as a drug and the repellent half to the EPA as a pesticide, and the two sets of label requirements cannot be reconciled on one pack, so the combined product cannot carry adequate directions for use.

The Skin Cancer Foundation's expert advice recommends two products, citing the SPF drop, studies showing sunscreen increases how much DEET is absorbed through skin, and the mismatched application directions.

Two things are worth noting about all of that. The concern is dose rather than idea of combining: the CDC's own guidance states that repellent used per label directions works alongside sunscreen with no loss of repellent activity, the same finding as the Australian study. And the picture these sources describe is a standalone spray, which can run anywhere from 5% to 100% DEET, applied by hand over a sunscreen that was never tested with it. A low-dose formulation assessed as one product is a different proposition. The caution is not universal, either: in the

Australia United States
Sunscreen oversight TGA: the combined product is listed medicine AUST L 310426 FDA: regulated as a drug
Repellent oversight APVMA: the combined product is registered APVMA 86717 EPA: regulated as a pesticide
Combined product assessed as one? Yes: listed and registered as sold No: split between two agencies
What the SPF number covers The finished formula, repellent included Each product alone; the layered pair untested
Repellent strength Combination products about 7% DEET Standalone sprays from 5% to 100% DEET
Reapplication Sunscreen every 2 hours; low-dose repellent sits near the same rhythm Sunscreen every 2 hours; repellent used sparingly and less often
Position on combining Combination products listed and sold FDA proposed not GRASE (2019); CDC advises separate products

When does a combined product make sense, and when doesn't it?

It makes sense when sun and insects turn up together and you have things to do: mowing or fencing through the middle of the day, a round of golf, an afternoon fishing, weeding the back half of a mozzie-prone block. One tube in the shed or the glovebox, applied once, instead of two bottles queued up on the verandah rail.

It makes less sense when only one problem is present. If there is sun and no insects, plain sunscreen is sufficient without wearing repellent for nothing. If the mozzies arrive after the sun has gone, repellent on its own is the right call. And where the biting is serious - dusk in the wet season, mangrove country - a stronger standalone repellent used as directed is the better fit, with sun protection handled separately.

Reapplication is the same conversation either way: sunscreen wants renewing at least every two hours outdoors, and a low-DEET formula's repellent window sits near that same rhythm. For the combined case, Outbacker SPF 50+ with insect repellent carries about 7.2% DEET, and the SPF 50+ on its label is with the repellent included. For worksites, there is the 1 litre pump. More on reapplication generally.